Child Rights
Every stamp has a consequence. Even if you never hear the scream. A personal case study of how the Swedish system removes families through policy and systemic denial — by withholding all means of subsistence, assigning a fictitious legal status, and fabricating retroactive debt based on that status. I. Introduction: Administrative
GDPR
May 2025 By J.V. Stämpelflykt This is not an accusation. This is a record. In May 2025, a series of structured complaints and formal notifications were submitted to Swedish and European data protection bodies. The aim was not to escalate conflict or demand punitive action, but to document a
Refugee Rights
Observations From Inside the Process By J.V. Stämpelflykt May 2025 Sweden is known for its strong legal tradition and commitment to human rights. But what happens when individuals — including children — seek protection and answers, only to encounter silence? This article does not accuse. It documents. Based on direct correspondence
Temporary Protection Directive
This publication is part of a structured documentation process. It contains selected correspondence with European institutions and human rights organizations, including formal complaints, legal memoranda, and evidence files. We publish only facts, without interpretation or judgment. 🟣 FARR — Flyktinggruppernas Riksråd 📩 6 May 2025 — Reply from FARR Acknowledged seriousness of the case
Refugee Rights
“Material reception conditions shall provide an adequate standard of living for applicants, which guarantees their subsistence and protects their physical and mental health.” — Directive 2013/33/EU, Article 17(2) Sweden receives EU funding for the reception of persons under temporary protection, including Ukrainians, through mechanisms such as the AMIF